Multi-Touch Attribution Models

When it comes to implementing multi-touch attribution (MTA), marketers have access to various models designed to allocate credit to different touchpoints within customer journeys. Each model offers unique strengths and weaknesses, and understanding these nuances is essential for making informed decisions. But not every model fits every scenario, so marketers must carefully evaluate their options. So, by recognizing the differences, they can select the ideal attribution model for their specific marketing goals and business needs.

Illustration summarizing key multi-touch attribution models, including linear, time-decay, U-shaped, and W-shaped models used to track marketing ROI.

Figure 1 

Types of Multi touch attribution

Here’s an in-depth exploration of the common multi-touch attribution models: 

  1. Linear Attribution Model

The Linear Attribution Model evenly distributes credit for conversions across each customer interaction or touchpoint. 

  • Easy to understand and implement. 
  • Recognizes every channel equally, preventing undervaluation of any specific touchpoint. 
  1. Time-Decay Attribution Model

The Time-Decay Model assigns more credit to touchpoints closer to the actual conversion. This model operates under the assumption that later touchpoints are more influential in driving conversions. 

  • Recognizes the increasing impact of customer interactions leading closer to purchase. 
  • Suitable for longer sales cycles or complex journeys. 
  1. U-Shaped (Position-Based) Attribution Model

In U-Shaped Attribution, the first and last touchpoints receive most of the credit, typically 40% each, while the remaining 20% is distributed equally among middle interactions. 

Pros: 

  • Emphasizes the importance of touchpoints initiating and finalizing conversion. 
  • Useful for businesses that highly value both brand awareness (first touch) and conversion (last touch). 
  1. W-Shaped Attribution Model

The W-Shaped Attribution Model allocates credit primarily across three crucial touchpoints: first interaction, lead creation, and final conversion. Each of these critical touchpoints receives about 30% each, with the remaining 10% evenly allocated among other interactions. 

  • Highlights three critical stages: initial engagement, lead conversion, and final sale. 
  • Ideal for businesses with clearly defined stages of the sales journey. 
Graphic depicting how algorithmic attribution models use data and machine learning to assign value across multiple touchpoints in the customer journey.

Figure 2 

  1. Custom or Algorithmic Attribution Model

Custom or Algorithmic Attribution Models use data-driven algorithms and machine learning to assign credit based on actual performance metrics. They assess historical data to assign value accurately to each touchpoint. 

Pros: 

  • Provides the most accurate reflection of customer journeys. 
  • Adapts based on actual results and dynamic data inputs. 
  • Great for businesses with extensive data resources. 

Cons: 

  • It can be expensive and complex to implement. 
  • Requires advanced analytics capabilities and data management infrastructure. 

Marketing Attribution Models Comparison 

Model Type Complexity Level Pros Cons Ideal For 
Linear Low Simple, fair distribution Equal weighting may distort reality General or beginner businesses 
Time Decay Moderate Emphasizes crucial later interactions Can undervalue early interactions Businesses with longer sales cycles 
U-Shaped Moderate Highlights first and last touchpoints Mid-journey touchpoints undervalued Balanced brand awareness & conversion 
W-Shaped Moderate-High Emphasizes key milestones Complex to implement Businesses with clear milestones 
Algorithmic/Custom High Highly accurate, data-driven Costly, technically demanding Large companies with big data sets 

Table 1

Choosing the Right Multi-touch attribution

Selecting the best multi-touch attribution model depends on your business goals, customer journey complexity, and available resources. Consider these factors clearly before implementation: 

  • Complexity of the customer journey: Longer journeys may benefit from time-decay or algorithmic models. 
  • Data availability: Algorithmic models require extensive historical data. 
  • Budget constraints: Linear or position-based models are cheaper and easier to implement. 
  • Business objectives: Align your model with your strategic marketing goals (awareness, lead nurturing, or conversions). 
Visual guide to choosing the right multi-touch attribution model based on business goals, customer journey complexity, data availability, and budget.

Figure 3 

For more insight: 

Coming next, you’ll learn exactly how multi-touch attribution works in practical scenarios and how to effectively track and measure your customer journey using advanced analytics solutions. 

Scroll to Top