When it comes to implementing multi-touch attribution (MTA), marketers have access to various models designed to allocate credit to different touchpoints within customer journeys. Each model offers unique strengths and weaknesses, and understanding these nuances is essential for making informed decisions. But not every model fits every scenario, so marketers must carefully evaluate their options. So, by recognizing the differences, they can select the ideal attribution model for their specific marketing goals and business needs.

Figure 1
Types of Multi touch attribution
Here’s an in-depth exploration of the common multi-touch attribution models:
- Linear Attribution Model
The Linear Attribution Model evenly distributes credit for conversions across each customer interaction or touchpoint.
- Easy to understand and implement.
- Recognizes every channel equally, preventing undervaluation of any specific touchpoint.
- Time-Decay Attribution Model
The Time-Decay Model assigns more credit to touchpoints closer to the actual conversion. This model operates under the assumption that later touchpoints are more influential in driving conversions.
- Recognizes the increasing impact of customer interactions leading closer to purchase.
- Suitable for longer sales cycles or complex journeys.
- U-Shaped (Position-Based) Attribution Model
In U-Shaped Attribution, the first and last touchpoints receive most of the credit, typically 40% each, while the remaining 20% is distributed equally among middle interactions.
Pros:
- Emphasizes the importance of touchpoints initiating and finalizing conversion.
- Useful for businesses that highly value both brand awareness (first touch) and conversion (last touch).
- W-Shaped Attribution Model
The W-Shaped Attribution Model allocates credit primarily across three crucial touchpoints: first interaction, lead creation, and final conversion. Each of these critical touchpoints receives about 30% each, with the remaining 10% evenly allocated among other interactions.
- Highlights three critical stages: initial engagement, lead conversion, and final sale.
- Ideal for businesses with clearly defined stages of the sales journey.

Figure 2
- Custom or Algorithmic Attribution Model
Custom or Algorithmic Attribution Models use data-driven algorithms and machine learning to assign credit based on actual performance metrics. They assess historical data to assign value accurately to each touchpoint.
Pros:
- Provides the most accurate reflection of customer journeys.
- Adapts based on actual results and dynamic data inputs.
- Great for businesses with extensive data resources.
Cons:
- It can be expensive and complex to implement.
- Requires advanced analytics capabilities and data management infrastructure.
Marketing Attribution Models Comparison
Model Type | Complexity Level | Pros | Cons | Ideal For |
Linear | Low | Simple, fair distribution | Equal weighting may distort reality | General or beginner businesses |
Time Decay | Moderate | Emphasizes crucial later interactions | Can undervalue early interactions | Businesses with longer sales cycles |
U-Shaped | Moderate | Highlights first and last touchpoints | Mid-journey touchpoints undervalued | Balanced brand awareness & conversion |
W-Shaped | Moderate-High | Emphasizes key milestones | Complex to implement | Businesses with clear milestones |
Algorithmic/Custom | High | Highly accurate, data-driven | Costly, technically demanding | Large companies with big data sets |
Table 1
Choosing the Right Multi-touch attribution
Selecting the best multi-touch attribution model depends on your business goals, customer journey complexity, and available resources. Consider these factors clearly before implementation:
- Complexity of the customer journey: Longer journeys may benefit from time-decay or algorithmic models.
- Data availability: Algorithmic models require extensive historical data.
- Budget constraints: Linear or position-based models are cheaper and easier to implement.
- Business objectives: Align your model with your strategic marketing goals (awareness, lead nurturing, or conversions).

Figure 3
For more insight:
- Learn more about our analytics and integration options at Kaytics Integrations.
- Discover powerful tools for attribution modeling on our Products Page.
- Google Attribution Models Explained
- Adobe’s Guide to Attribution Modeling
Coming next, you’ll learn exactly how multi-touch attribution works in practical scenarios and how to effectively track and measure your customer journey using advanced analytics solutions.